Organizational behavior and group dynamics

Social validation allows individuals to justify their attitudes and values while social comparison helps individuals evaluate their own actions by comparing themselves to others.

Employees who are in cohesive groups are often more satisfied and engaged than counterparts who aren't. According to Cherrington, the main purposes of reference groups are social validation and social comparison.

Thus, an insight that in relationships exchange of thoughts and ideas is positive and essential if individuals are to be attracted to and affiliate with a group.


They make take the form of dominating discussions, verbally attacking other group members, and distracting the group with trivial information or unnecessary humor.

Informal groups can have a strong influence in organizations that can either be positive or negative.

When you put someone in charge of a group, its members may or may not follow them based on their leadership. They are created for purposes other than the accomplishment of organizational goals and do not have a specified time frame. Group leaders and members can offer additional resources, or they can help to reduce any barriers and constraints that interfere during the transition process of group processes.

This confusion may occur because the members do not have specific job descriptions or because the instructions regarding the task were not clear.

If they reject both types of norms, they're considered to be in open revolution. This is especially important for those who feel more insecure. Are we relating to and communicating with each other in ways that enhance group dynamics and help us achieve our goals.

This stage is not is not experienced by all groups, because it is characterized by the performance discharged by the group. You may also define specific goals and objectives around the mission and purpose. Video of the Day Brought to you by Techwalla Brought to you by Techwalla Group Facilitation Leaders who understand the different characteristics of group formation within an organization can assist individuals in their transition through the different stages of development.

According to the Johns Hopkins Center for Clinical Global Health Education, during the first stage of group formation in the workplace, members seek safety and protection; their connection with other workers is superficial. They are created in an effort to determine levels of individual effort.

However, highly cohesive groups may be detrimental to organizational performance if their goals are misaligned with organizational goals. Members often voice concern and criticism in this phase.

A group also has systems and processes, such as for communication. They involve a variety of specific roles such as initiator, informer, clarifier, summarizer, and reality tester.

The dominator role attempts to control conversations by patronizing others. Also encourage them to praise each other.

The nature of the task or leadership of the group has not been determined Luthans, They come across several stages of development as they struggle to become productive and effectual. Members are generally more personally satisfied and feel greater self-confidence and self-esteem when in a group where they feel they belong.

Questioning and resisting direction from the leader is also quite common. Interest groups usually continue over time and may last longer than general informal groups.

Evidence suggests that groups typically outperform individuals when the tasks involved require a variety of skills, experience, and decision making. Incomplete assessments of the problem, Incomplete information search, Inadequate development of alternatives, and Failure to examine the risks of the preferred choice.

For many, membership in such a group can be a buffer against stress, which can improve mental and physical well-being. In this stage usually responsibilities are divided among members and the group decides on evaluating progress.

Keep in mind that groups can have too much cohesion. In such an environment, groups can easily adopt extreme ideas that will not be challenged. Production tasks require a group to produce an outcome, such as ideas, while discussion tasks require it to evaluate issues.

For example, work roles and family roles often compete with one another and cause conflict. Group dynamics are pertinent in both formal and informal groups of all types. Another example of the validity of the group development model involves groups that take the time to get to know each other socially in the forming stage.

For example, workers may stop working a production machine at 20 minutes before quitting time in order to wash up, even though they produced fewer items that day than management intended. In this stage, the group is likely to see the highest level of disagreement and conflict.

While research has not confirmed that this is descriptive of how groups progress, knowing and following these steps can help groups be more effective.


Micro organizational behavior refers to individual and group dynamics in an organizational setting. Macro organizational theory studies whole organizations and industries, including how they adapt, and the strategies, structures, and contingencies that guide them.

Recognizing and responding to change is the oxygen of life for an organization, and leadership is fundamentally about focusing organizations on these new rea.

The Characteristics of Groups in Organizational Behavior

Organizational Behaviour, Group Dynamics & Teamwork. Published on July 18, Group dynamics and teamwork is called for: patterned behavior and look to the group leader for guidance and. Organizational dynamics is defined as the process of continuously strengthening resources and enhancing employee performances.

It can also be described as how an organization manages and promotes organizational learning, better business practices and strategic management. A formal work group is made up of managers, subordinates, or both with close associations among group members that influence the behavior of individuals in the group.

We will discuss many different types of formal work groups later on in this chapter. In an organizational setting, groups are a very common organizational entity and the study of groups and group dynamics is an important area of study in organizational behavior.

There are several theories on why groups develop.

Organizational behavior and group dynamics
Rated 4/5 based on 35 review
Group Dynamics - organization, levels, examples, type, company, Group development, Group types